I think that the Land Rover Defender ‘replacement’ is a bit
of a joke. Surely the word ‘replacement’ means just that; that the new machine
can do what the old one could do? Or does it have some other meaning?
Most of the time when we see a concept vehicle, we get
excited about the prospect that the manufacturer may one day actually build it.
But in this case, I dread this one. Any friend of the Land Rover has got to be
concerned that the icon of their brand is about to become yet another SUV.
All the well-meaning styling in the world isn’t going to
change the fact that you need a truck to do a truck’s job. Can you see a DC100
carrying an expedition’s load through Malawi? Or help the Third Para Regiment plot
a minefield?
Let’s make it easier… How about a bail of hay to the farmer
next door?
Or, even easier… How about sitting in city traffic with a
driver who feels almost as if he/she’s on safari – something that very few
vehicles have ever managed to do successfully – something at which the Defender is a master?